Congress and Robots

Spurred on by Pittsburgh’s ongoing dominance in robot racing, robot nursing, robot soccer, and robot… well, just about everything, our Congressman has joined with a colleague from Tennessee to launch the Congressional Robotics Caucus. (The article is worth reading for the graphic alone.) Being a roboticist, I appreciate Mr. Doyle’s intent and the shout-out to all my peeps down at CMU, but I’ve got mixed feelings about this. The robotics sector is doing pretty well on its own — we make things that people want to buy and fund research into, because they’re useful, they’re cost-effective, and they’re just plain cool. The main power Congress has is to either toss regulations at us (which would slow down progress) or toss money at us. Money would maybe help things in the short term, but in the long term, it’ll harm our industry. Why? Because Congressional appropriations, and especially appropriations on the research side, distort the basic competitive process and especially distort the peer-review on which solid science depends. In the short run, some projects at CMU will go faster because they get the extra help. In the long run, our field could stagnate because people become too dependent on the political process instead of the engineering process.

We’ve got a pretty good thing going here, and it’s likely to become a major economic driver for our region. The best way to help it along, though, might just be to leave it alone.

2 Comments so far

  1. James Foreman (unregistered) on June 21st, 2007 @ 6:53 pm

    Though I don’t think you meant to, your argument in favor of private funding (with which I agree) is also a nice summary of the most cogent argument against both socialized medicine and the current health insurance system.

  2. Alik Widge (unregistered) on June 21st, 2007 @ 10:57 pm

    I actually think there’s better arguments against single-payer healthcare than the one at the core in this case, but that’s a post for another time (though I’m about to head out to AMA meeting to debate precisely that topic).


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.